Of course, the step was then very short, in practice many laboratories in many thought they had fou

Of course, the step was then very short, in practice many laboratories in many thought they had found in the cavitation bubbles subject to the "microscopic nuclear shaped charges", provided that the gas inside temperature si unit the bubbles contained substances whose nuclei could give nuclear reactions when they undergo the shock wave of cavitation and to its high temperature. Unfortunately experiments Diebner and Gerlach had not been sufficiently well known, so this idea of "microscopic nuclear shaped charges" was in fact a rediscovery of ideas Diebner and Gerlach.
Cardone makes a mistake in interpreting the experiments Diebner, at least as seen from the text of R. Karlsch, H. Petermann - Für u. wider "Hitlers Bombe" Waxmann, 2007. Cardone used (or attempted to use) the shock wave caused temperature si unit by chemical explosives (dynamite, according to Cardone) to reduce the volume of a sphere of nuclear fuel subcritical and make sovracritico, a technique now widely applied, as you know. The shock waves are used exclusively to reduce the volume of a nuclear explosive, a purely mechanical process that does not involve the nuclei, completely unrelated to what is happening around. Cardone passes arbitrarily enforced by the contraction of a metallic crystal lattice energy to situations much more extreme, those necessary to collide two nuclei of deuterium, causing it to melt, can not be obtained for sonocavitazione, as the repeated failures of Taleyarkhan have shown. Once again you come across an error of assessment of concentrations of energy; this di ff we have grown accustomed, a kind of systematic error. They are able to calmly confront a horn with a particle accelerator. In mid-January I will have the item Diebner of 1962 and I can give precise details about what he was able to accomplish during the war.
But you, Gabrichan, in your first experiments verify that the sulfur is not there? In any object involved in the experiment? And then, with regard to environmental contamination, what can you say? Have you a cleanroom ISO 1 in the basement?
No I do not have a cleanroom ISO1 in the basement, but not knowing the nature of the experiments that I do and the results is interesting to note that you asked questions. The answer is simple, however, depends on the amount, it is obvious that if there is only a few ppm at the end of the synthesis material of the doubt that there is some contamination there may also be, but if the resulting material is 30% of the material origin, and a few tenths of a gram, maybe the question is not there and even with a fairly spartan type of analysis is sufficient to reveal something, temperature si unit without resorting to sophisticated equipment. However S.Natale also good to you :)
To me, however, wonder if the same pan used for expressing the afternoon of Nuclear Physics of the border have content until lunch cabbage or onions. Obviously, then, to find the sulfur! Anyway, senz'analisi before and after "experiments" are totally inconclusive results: it is totally unnecessary to discuss and even would be taken into consideration. Very funny is the idea of "reaction" nuclear K - O = Na, note that the minus sign is not a typo. Appearance with anxiety that occur in the laboratory temperature si unit as well the reactions p * Be (9) = Be (9) and Fe (56) / He (4) = Al (14) so as to complete the arithmetic nuclear. The discovery of Al (14) would be perhaps the Nobel Prize?
I really do not grab the funny side? You, too, not joking: I tracked down on energeticambiente a discussion in which you say you've been experimenting with "an electrode for welding cast iron" and the "nails". I can make myself an experiment with a handlebar of a bicycle and an iron welded?
We come to the point of humor. 1) Reasoning of Mondaini "azzurini-green crystals, and CuSO4 or CuSO3." temperature si unit Now, I just take a ride on en.wikipedia to find other fourteen (14) of compounds of the Cu-green azzurini. As he did, to view, to recognize all of the CuSO4 is amazing! Yeah, because among those 14 is also, incidentally, Cu (OH) 2 CO 3 and Cu. Do not you say anything? Hint: it is employing an aqueous solution of K2 CO3.
2) S and Na are naturally present as impurities nell'H2O used in K2CO3 and Cu (as indeed shows Mondaini in another video). In addition, for washing glassware I think he used some detergent, which-coincidentally case - contain their Na and S. Then, the electrodes of Cu are perhaps those who smanazzato as you can see in the video? If you have used gloves, with what has come in contact? These questions must let you all, because I have the impression that you are a bit 'too much sport in conducting the experiments. But most of all, do you really think that by evaporating a